hup_d_dup wrote:The replacement cap is a 30/20/20/20 525v, which is what the schematic calls for.
I seen recommendations that the new cap should be rated at a higher voltage. Also one vendor is selling a cap that has higher capacitance, I think 80/40/30/30 ... something like that.
Is this a worthwhile improvement?
525 volts is marginal at best. Quite often the AC line can be at 130VAC which puts a 525V capacitor in the danger zone, especially during turn-on. The delayed-on characteristic of the 5AR4 helps, though. I have gone to series-connected 350V electrolytics on my Mark II, making a 700V rating, safe with its 5U4 rectifier which has no such delayed-on characteristic.
The previous poster said that if you were to use the 80mfd section of that 80/40/30/30 cap, the feed to the output transformer should be placed in the second position, after the choke...and I quite agree.
As to your original fuse-blow, it's possible that a short occurred across a section of the quad electrolytic, which was then blown out by the current before the fuse blew. This happens quite a bit on old, marginal electrolytics, leaving no evidence that anything ever happened.
You didn't say...did you replace the tubes? When one of my Mark II blew a fuse lately, the cause was one of the Mullard EL34 output tubes that arced over intermittently. No evidence of runaway or of any other problems...just a bright arc, a POP and the blown fuse.