Is it possible to run the Bob Latino ST-70 or ST-120 amps in a bridged mode? Has anyone done this? Any general comments?
Thanks.
Thanks.
+2
Bob Latino
hamrhed97
6 posters
Bridged ST-70 or ST-120 Amps?
hamrhed97- Posts : 2
Join date : 2010-01-09
hamrhed97- Posts : 2
Join date : 2010-01-09
Bob,
Thanks for the reply. Are there any limitations or trade-offs to wiring the amps as monoblocks as opposed to a bi-wire set up with a pair of stereo amps?
Thanks.
Thanks for the reply. Are there any limitations or trade-offs to wiring the amps as monoblocks as opposed to a bi-wire set up with a pair of stereo amps?
Thanks.
Bob Latino- Admin
- Posts : 3263
Join date : 2008-11-26
Location : Massachusetts
hamrhed97 wrote:Bob,
Thanks for the reply. Are there any limitations or trade-offs to wiring the amps as monoblocks as opposed to a bi-wire set up with a pair of stereo amps?
Thanks.
Hi,
If your speakers have two inputs I would go the bi-wire route. From connecting speakers with these amps both ways, I think (for some reason) these amps sound better biwired than to make the dual channel amp a monoblock. It may have something to do with separating the woofer and tweeter sections of the speakers and giving them their own amp. It could also be that when the amp is wired as a monoblock you have two output transformers wired together and slight differences between the two transformers can cause subtle out of phase (negative) effects. I might add here that the difference between the two methods is very small and also that this is really IMHO.
The trade off is that to truly run the amp as a monoblock you can't just wire up the stereo/mono switch, flip the switch to mono and connect your speaker. If you do that you wind up with two 35 watt amps carrying the same signal. When you connect your speaker to either speaker terminal it is still going to look at just 35 watts. To really make the amp a monoblock you also have to run a wire from the 16 ohm speaker terminal on one channel to the 16 ohm speaker terminal on the other channel IF you have 8 ohm speakers. The 70 watts would then be available at either speaker terminal. If you have 4 ohm speakers you would run a wire from the 8 ohm terminal to the other 8 ohm terminal and again the 70 watts would be available on either speaker terminal. Simply put, it takes more effort to truly make the amp a monoblock ...
Bob
pgsvensk- Posts : 3
Join date : 2012-04-21
I'm a newbie here, so please be gentle. I've acquired a Dahlquist DQ-1W sub, and a Dynaco ST-120. How would I bridge the amp to drive that sub? I would likely have to pay someone to do any mods. Any helpful information would be most appreciated. Thanks!
hawaii.ken- Posts : 157
Join date : 2012-01-31
@pgsvensk
I think it would be helpful if you would give some details of your whole system.
I think it would be helpful if you would give some details of your whole system.
GP49- Posts : 792
Join date : 2009-04-30
Location : East of the sun and west of the moon
The only proper way is to invert the phase of one channel and take the output across the HOT outputs. The Dynaco method of operating the Stereo 70 in mono by paralleling the channels does not work well; it causes high distortion and does NOT double the output power as claimed.
Whatever means you use to invert the phase of one channel, generally an inverting amplifier stage, must be of as good quality as the rest of the amp, otherwise it will degrade the performance.
Whatever means you use to invert the phase of one channel, generally an inverting amplifier stage, must be of as good quality as the rest of the amp, otherwise it will degrade the performance.
pgsvensk- Posts : 3
Join date : 2012-04-21
@hawaii.ken: Oops, here you go: Tandberg 3006A power amplifier, Tandberg 3008a control amplifier (both in excellent condition), and 2 M&K Bookshelf 75 speakers on original M&K stands, Sony BDP-S480 Blu-Ray player, and an attached computer full of lossless FLAC files. This is essentially my music-only system for my home office, there's a multi-channel A/V system upstairs.
hawaii.ken- Posts : 157
Join date : 2012-01-31
@pgsvensk This is only a recommendation:
Use your ST-120 to drive your M&K Bookshelf 75 speakers. Use one channel of your Tandberg 3006A power amplifier to drive your Dahlquist DQ-1W sub.
Passive line level crossover:
http://store.hlabs.com/pk4/store.pl?view_product=25
You may have to get some of the attenuators to match the levels between the ST-120 and the Tandberg 3006A.
Use your ST-120 to drive your M&K Bookshelf 75 speakers. Use one channel of your Tandberg 3006A power amplifier to drive your Dahlquist DQ-1W sub.
Passive line level crossover:
http://store.hlabs.com/pk4/store.pl?view_product=25
You may have to get some of the attenuators to match the levels between the ST-120 and the Tandberg 3006A.
ruffian- Posts : 43
Join date : 2010-02-26
pgsvensk wrote:I'm a newbie here, so please be gentle. I've acquired a Dahlquist DQ-1W sub, and a Dynaco ST-120. How would I bridge the amp to drive that sub? I would likely have to pay someone to do any mods. Any helpful information would be most appreciated. Thanks!
Do you have one of the solid state 'Dynaco ST-120' amps? When you say ST-120 here people think you are refering to the tube amp sold by tubes4hifi/Bob Latino. They are entirely different beasts.
pgsvensk- Posts : 3
Join date : 2012-04-21
@ruffian, ah yes, I have the solid state ST-120.
Bob Latino- Admin
- Posts : 3263
Join date : 2008-11-26
Location : Massachusetts
The VTA ST-120 is TUBE amp and the the original Dynaco solid state amp was called the "Stereo 120" not the "ST-120". Apparently, enough people call this original Dynaco solid state amp the "ST-120" that confusion has set in between the original Dynaco amp and the VTA ST-120. Probably in hindsight, I should have named the VTA ST-120 the "VTA ST-125" to avoid the confusion.
As a side note, back in the mid 1960's I heard the original Dynaco Stereo 120 solid state amp. It was probably (at least in its stock form) the WORST sounding amplifier that I ever heard. Yeah - It "measured good" but sounded bad. Hard, brittle, flat etc. and when pushed hard to the point of distortion the top end of this amp would make your "ears bleed". I though at the time > "This is the future of hi-fi?". There is a fellow on Ebay who (at least he used to?) sell upgrade kits for the original Dynaco Stereo 120 that would make the amp sound noticeably better. I guess we can forgive Dynaco for the original Dynaco Stereo 120. Many of the original solid state designs of the 1960's (by todays standards) were not very reliable and were, in general, poor sounding amps.
Bob
As a side note, back in the mid 1960's I heard the original Dynaco Stereo 120 solid state amp. It was probably (at least in its stock form) the WORST sounding amplifier that I ever heard. Yeah - It "measured good" but sounded bad. Hard, brittle, flat etc. and when pushed hard to the point of distortion the top end of this amp would make your "ears bleed". I though at the time > "This is the future of hi-fi?". There is a fellow on Ebay who (at least he used to?) sell upgrade kits for the original Dynaco Stereo 120 that would make the amp sound noticeably better. I guess we can forgive Dynaco for the original Dynaco Stereo 120. Many of the original solid state designs of the 1960's (by todays standards) were not very reliable and were, in general, poor sounding amps.
Bob
|
|
|