12AU7 driver tube comparison
Bob
Dedicated to the restoration and preservation of all original Dynaco tube audio equipment - Customer support for Tubes4hifi VTA tube amp and preamp kits and all Dynakitparts.com products
JJ ecc82 is doing well, thank you.OneyedK wrote:Interesting read...
But what I really want to know is how the current production 12AU7's are doing:
Shuguang 12AU7A / ECC82-C
JJ Electronic ECC82 / 12AU7
JJ Electronic ECC802S / 12AU7
JJ Electronic ECC82 / 12AU7 Gold
JJ Electronic ECC802S / 12AU7 Gold
Elektro Harmonix 12AU7 / ECC82
Elektro Harmonix 12AU7 / ECC82 Gold-pin
Mullard (Russia) 12AU7 / ECC82
Gold Lion (Genalex Russia)12AU7 / ECC82
Psvane 12AU7-T-MII/2
6N2P's are more or less equivalent for 12AX7, with a different heater pinout.Dahlberg wrote:Would the 6n2p fit among these, not sure about the filament arrangement ?
Good to know!peterh wrote:JJ ecc82 is doing well, thank you. And as i have an ample
supply of jj i choosed them :-)
OneyedK wrote:Good to know!peterh wrote:JJ ecc82 is doing well, thank you. And as i have an ample
supply of jj i choosed them :-)
I use the JJ ECC83S most of the time (buy a "boatload", measure and match) whenever I need a 12AX7/ECC83.
Guess I can do the same with the ECC82's.
Any benefit in choosing the JJ ECC802S?
I only have experience with the 803, they tend to bleed hum from the heaters into the circuit (same problem with the Sovtek LPS),peterh wrote:As far as i have seen 802/803, the longplate variant, is preferred by guitar folks due
to their greater stability and resistance to microphonics. A valuable feature when
operated inside a combo amp.
That's great info, gotta keep that in mind when my stash diminishespeterh wrote:As for ecc83, the ECC83MG has less spread in parameters, seem to be tighter tolerances.
No need for matching and better predictability ( they are all alike :-), this is what
i suggest for hifi.
Dahlberg wrote:Here's a guy who has made some comparisons, scroll down a bit on the page to post 53.
http://www.head-fi.org/t/763045/review-wa7-lcd-2f-dac-shoot-out-tube-guide-updated/45
Dahlberg wrote:I have a specific plan for finding a tube for the front tube position that
exels in precision and dynamic performace in the bass region.
I'm not using the amps outside of 65-350hz so it's fairly specialised.
I'm using Sylvania Jan 5814A in both positions now and the lowest bass
response has realistic level and a beautiful tone on acoustic bass.
I feel it's a little bit rounded of listening to for instance "Yello-Touch-Petro Oleum",
there is a repeting subsonic decay of the drums that's simply brutal when
everything works as it should. Imagine a brutaly vibrating wave beneth the
floorboards moving from 1 meter behind the speakers to and under the sofa
your sitting in repeting itself Now it's there but not as brutal as I
have heard it before, the location is above the floor and a bit diffuse.
I have bought some tubes aimed at the refinement of this area.
Level of bass is adjustable but resolution and dynamics has to come from elsewhere.
Based solely on the opinion of others I came up with , Tungsol 12au7 (new),
RCA clear tops 12au7, Philips JAN 5963 and RCA 5963.
LeGrace wrote:Dahlberg wrote:I have a specific plan for finding a tube for the front tube position that
exels in precision and dynamic performace in the bass region.
I'm not using the amps outside of 65-350hz so it's fairly specialised.
I'm using Sylvania Jan 5814A in both positions now and the lowest bass
response has realistic level and a beautiful tone on acoustic bass.
I feel it's a little bit rounded of listening to for instance "Yello-Touch-Petro Oleum",
there is a repeting subsonic decay of the drums that's simply brutal when
everything works as it should. Imagine a brutaly vibrating wave beneth the
floorboards moving from 1 meter behind the speakers to and under the sofa
your sitting in repeting itself Now it's there but not as brutal as I
have heard it before, the location is above the floor and a bit diffuse.
I have bought some tubes aimed at the refinement of this area.
Level of bass is adjustable but resolution and dynamics has to come from elsewhere.
Based solely on the opinion of others I came up with , Tungsol 12au7 (new),
RCA clear tops 12au7, Philips JAN 5963 and RCA 5963.
Your idea to use M125 amps for range 65-350 hz is an interesting one. As you are obviously very knowledgeable, I decide to also investigate this possibility in my system. I do not have ability to dial in the frequency to exactly match, but I am not so far off, 80-400hz. So now < 80 Hz is on subwoofer that has its own 500w built in SS amp, 80-400 hz is 250 mm bass driver of my Tannoy D700 connected to M125's, and >400 Hz is by my Marantz 100/ch SS integrated.
Before I have both the floor standers and the sub covering bottom range, but the bass is cleaner and stronger now that there is no competition between them anymore. I notice improvement in sound stage as well, more expansive. Next I am thinking to roll my 6550's back in. Please share if you find improved driver tube.
Anyway, thank you Dahlberg! I am very happy with the results!
Dahlberg wrote:I plugged in the 12au7 Tungsol new production five minutes ago. It has the lowest noise so
far, measured 2,5mV ac on speaker outputs. None other has been under 3,5mV so far.
wgallupe wrote:Dahlberg wrote:I plugged in the 12au7 Tungsol new production five minutes ago. It has the lowest noise so
far, measured 2,5mV ac on speaker outputs. None other has been under 3,5mV so far.
Looking forward to your impressions on how they sound compared to the others you have tried.