by Bob Latino Thu Mar 31, 2011 7:18 pm
I am not surprised that both of the above posters found the "AVA Ultravalve" amp somewhat "lacking" in musical value. The "Ultravalve ST-70" (an oxymoron?) still uses two older design 6GH8A driver tubes. Personally, I don't care how you jerk the circuit around, a 6GH8A pentode/triode tube, as used on the Ultravalve ST-70, is not a good driver tube. It is not linear at all drive levels and rolls off the top and bottom end of the audio spectrum. Coventional wisdom is to use an all triode drive system. The ultravalve also (AFAIK) still uses a bandwidth limiting circuit although I have heard that the bandwidth limiting on the newer untravalve ST-70's is less than it used to be. On the AVA web site they call it > "getting the bandwidths of the power supply, audio circuits, and input acceptance into the right set of ratios so that no input signal short of output clipping could drive the unit into gross distortion at any frequency." I guess this is a rant here but my thought is > "don't use bandwidth limiting for God sakes, just design a friggin circuit that is FLAT and linear at all drive levels and also sounds clean WITH tube warmth thrown in." Now > charge $2000 for this amp ? Huh ? I'll build you TWO VTA ST-70's for that price.
Personally. I don't thing AVA sells many "Ultravalve" ST-70's ...
Bob