The Dynaco Tube Audio Forum

Would you like to react to this message? Create an account in a few clicks or log in to continue.
The Dynaco Tube Audio Forum

Dedicated to the restoration and preservation of all original Dynaco tube audio equipment - Customer support for Tubes4hifi VTA tube amp and preamp kits and all Dynakitparts.com products


+10
deepee99
Elrick
Tiziano73
Jim McShane
corndog71
stewdan
wildiowa
peterh
DynakitParts
BNR_1
14 posters

    Recommend Modern New Production 6550 for Mark III

    avatar
    hrbay


    Posts : 3
    Join date : 2014-10-25

    Recommend Modern New Production 6550 for Mark III - Page 2 Empty Mk III Tung Sol 6550 / best replacement

    Post by hrbay Tue Jun 12, 2018 10:13 pm

    Here I am in 2018 wondering if those Mk III's (not hot rodded) are as good as I remember, they've been mothballed for 10 years now. They were the best bedroom heaters. Output tube wise I don't want to use the Tung Sol 6550's that I used before because they valued out of sight, replacement wise, and my ears are not going to hear any subtle differences anyhow. Likewise with the Mullard GZ34 rectifiers. Are the KT66/KT88 Pavanes/Shuguangs a good sub for the 6550's and what about the "new" Tung Sol 5AR4/GZ34 tube rectifier replacements. Thanks


    Last edited by hrbay on Tue Jun 12, 2018 10:22 pm; edited 1 time in total (Reason for editing : salutation)
    peterh
    peterh


    Posts : 1869
    Join date : 2012-12-25
    Location : gothenburg, sweden

    Recommend Modern New Production 6550 for Mark III - Page 2 Empty Re: Recommend Modern New Production 6550 for Mark III

    Post by peterh Wed Jun 13, 2018 1:05 am

    hrbay wrote:Here I am in 2018 wondering if those Mk III's (not hot rodded) are as good as I remember, they've been mothballed for 10 years now. They were the best bedroom heaters. Output tube wise I don't want to use the Tung Sol 6550's that I used before because they valued out of sight, replacement wise, and my ears are not going to hear any subtle differences anyhow. Likewise with the Mullard GZ34 rectifiers. Are the KT66/KT88 Pavanes/Shuguangs a good sub for the 6550's and what about the "new" Tung Sol 5AR4/GZ34 tube rectifier replacements. Thanks
    You can use JJ 6550 . I have a quad in use that has 3850h on them.
    JJ KT88 is an alternative, although more expensive.
    corndog71
    corndog71


    Posts : 840
    Join date : 2013-03-19
    Location : It can get windy here

    Recommend Modern New Production 6550 for Mark III - Page 2 Empty Re: Recommend Modern New Production 6550 for Mark III

    Post by corndog71 Wed Jun 13, 2018 1:42 am

    I had a set of the new Tung Sol 6550’s in my VTA-120 and they worked well.
    avatar
    New2Tubez


    Posts : 185
    Join date : 2018-03-20
    Location : NY

    Recommend Modern New Production 6550 for Mark III - Page 2 Empty Re: Recommend Modern New Production 6550 for Mark III

    Post by New2Tubez Wed Jun 13, 2018 2:37 pm

    I'm also using new Tung Sol 6550's in my VTA ST-120 and they sound great. I built my amp in March '18.

    I initially got them because I read that they're said to have great all around sound with nice top end but a little less bass than the KT88s. I may get the reissue Genalex Gold Lions down the road but have speaker placement to work out first. Not in any rush.

    FWIW, currently using a Tung Sol 5AR4 rectifier but will change to the Weber WS-1t after I install my auto bias board.
    deepee99
    deepee99


    Posts : 2244
    Join date : 2012-05-23
    Location : Wallace, Idaho

    Recommend Modern New Production 6550 for Mark III - Page 2 Empty Re: Recommend Modern New Production 6550 for Mark III

    Post by deepee99 Wed Jun 13, 2018 5:46 pm

    hrbay wrote:Here I am in 2018 wondering if those Mk III's (not hot rodded) are as good as I remember, they've been mothballed for 10 years now. They were the best bedroom heaters. Output tube wise I don't want to use the Tung Sol 6550's that I used before because they valued out of sight, replacement wise, and my ears are not going to hear any subtle differences anyhow. Likewise with the Mullard GZ34 rectifiers. Are the KT66/KT88 Pavanes/Shuguangs a good sub for the 6550's and what about the "new" Tung Sol 5AR4/GZ34 tube rectifier replacements. Thanks
    The PSVane/Shuguangs are very good after a lengthy (100-hour) burn in time. Jury's still out on how long they'll last . . .
    Can't help you on the new-issue rectifiers; best to hold out for an original Mullard GZ-33 or-37, or go the Weber route.
    As to power tubes, I'd save your shekels for the original GEC KT-88s. A quad goes for a kilobuck but unless the getter flashing is toasted off, they'll likely last forever, and to me, who has tried NOS 6550s and all the modern stuff, they pull all the music there is from your source and deliver it gently into the room.

    Sponsored content


    Recommend Modern New Production 6550 for Mark III - Page 2 Empty Re: Recommend Modern New Production 6550 for Mark III

    Post by Sponsored content


      Current date/time is Tue Nov 26, 2024 6:09 am