by setu Mon May 02, 2022 7:36 pm
Hi Peter,
I have often enjoyed your very helpful Dynaco posts. Thanks very much!
In 2002 i removed the PAS-3X blend-switch because i viewed it as potential 'impurity' in the
totsig (total signal path) and the signal is much lower at blend-switch (prior to 12AX7 amplification).
I dislike wafer pots, switch contacts etc that I cannot internally clean. 60 year old metals often have corrosion inside.
I do not use Deoxit as many do----i prefer 99% isopropyl alcohol in precise spray bottle.
I do like original look but I think PAS-3x bass,treble pots & blend-switch holes make good air vents
especially if you drill similar air vent holes in steel base-plate AND install 1in decent rubber feet to elevate&isolate.
Those PAS hard plastic short feet are terrible.
In one minor way i disliked my blend-switch removal:
in addition to my 2 living-room speakers I had a large 3rd speaker in backyard for summer fun
running 10AWG speaker wire 75ft under house.
I used male/female 1/4in plugs for switching to/from outdoor speaker but that just gave 1 mono channel
to outdoor speaker (choose R or L)
If you keep your blend switch then any 3rd speaker sound could be a blended(R+L) rather than just mono.
Note: I am VERY biased in favor of minimal signal path.
One can easily see the intentions of PAS-3X high filter, bass&treble pots, blend-switch.
personally I only want balance & volume controls "less=more"
On my PAS-3X at 75% clockwise VOL rotation I still have minor undesirable R&L blending.
my goal is usually to maximize R&L separation so I spent time with wire-routing to avoid
R&L blending. I suspect the unwanted R&L blending occurs inside tape/source switch or Vol or Bal controls.
best regards,
setu